Sadegh Khoorsha; mohamad hadi moradi; Hesam Haaj Momen
Abstract
The present article is an attempt to discover the order governing the linguistic elements in Surah Al-Kafirun [109]. The question posed is that as a literary text, what linguistic and semantic structures does the Surah Al-Kafirun adopt? This is answered through binary oppositions as well as syntagmatic ...
Read More
The present article is an attempt to discover the order governing the linguistic elements in Surah Al-Kafirun [109]. The question posed is that as a literary text, what linguistic and semantic structures does the Surah Al-Kafirun adopt? This is answered through binary oppositions as well as syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. The study will be a descriptive-comparative one. The first section of the article presents an applied analysis of the structural approach to text study. The second section analyses the Surah Al-Kafirun according to the aforementioned analysis, which shows the text is built up of three main structures based on three main binary oppositions, with the second opposition itself built up of four minor structures based on three minor binary oppositions. One of these minor oppositions has been repeated in the text, once with Positive implications and once with Negative implications. The linguistic elements in the text have been used in such a way that simultaneously divide and join the Surah structures. This occurs both in the semantic representation of the text on the one hand and in morphological, lexical, and syntactic representations on the other. The structural analysis shows how the intended meanings have been presented through paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in a coherent structure.
Ali Saiadani; Rasool Bazyar; Elham Kari
Volume 3, Issue 9 , December 2014, , Pages 37-54
Abstract
Structure and structuralism are among the terms for which several lexical equivalents have been allocated in the works of lexicographers, critics and linguists of the Arabic language, the most common equivalents of which are as follows: "Albenyaviyat, albenniyat, albenaeiyat, albenviyat, albenyaniyat, ...
Read More
Structure and structuralism are among the terms for which several lexical equivalents have been allocated in the works of lexicographers, critics and linguists of the Arabic language, the most common equivalents of which are as follows: "Albenyaviyat, albenniyat, albenaeiyat, albenviyat, albenyaniyat, alhaykaliyat, altarkibiyat, etc." The major causes of this type of rendition challenges in the Arabic language are: "different understanding of Arabic critics and linguists of modern concepts of western criticism, incognizance of authors from each other’s academic works, and ethnical and linguistic intolerance". The most challenging equivalent terms in the Arabic language are: Albenyaviyat and albenniyat. Authors and lexicographers who have used these terms in their works proceed to do this in accordance with two grammatical principles of the Arabic language ‘albenniyat’ and/or spread of common mistake theory ‘Albenyaviyat’. In this study, we intend to verify their accuracy and determine the origins of the choice of these berserk equivalents, by surveying these terms in the lexicons, critical works, linguistic researches and grammar of the Arabic language.
Hassan Goodarzi Lemraski; Mostafa Kamajgoo
Volume 2, Issue 5 , December 2012, , Pages 100-83
Abstract
Parnas which equals "al-fannlil-fann" or "al-barnasiyah" in Arabic and "art for art" in Persian, is a literary criticism school of thought and the borderline between romanticism and symbolism which has, unlike romanticism, neither compromised the poem for personal feelings and adopts it as a tool for ...
Read More
Parnas which equals "al-fannlil-fann" or "al-barnasiyah" in Arabic and "art for art" in Persian, is a literary criticism school of thought and the borderline between romanticism and symbolism which has, unlike romanticism, neither compromised the poem for personal feelings and adopts it as a tool for expression of the inner perceptions and verve of the poet, nor, like symbolism, is of complexity and ambiguity, but it is based on the belief that poem is beautiful in its own capacity and it should be attached its proper value.
This research aimsto survey this school of thought in the beliefs of one of the prominent Lebanese poets, Amin Nakhlahand explain its various aspects.
In this research, the aim is to express the objectives of the poem in the views of Amin Nakhlah due to the fact that as a Parnassian poet, he aims to devote himself to the mere beauty of the poem and no other specific objectives should be sought in it.
In this essay some of his odes such as "al-bulbul","al-shallal" and "al-habib" have been examined and it has been concluded that Amin Nakhlah is a structuralist classic poet who attaches special importance to the form of words and way of expression, not to its nature.In the meantime, itrepresents the ivory tower literature which elaborates on issues such as love, bulbul (nightingale) and the like.
